Friday, June 04, 2004

Overwhelming Verbosity

This article discusses what I see as a growing annoyance in movie titles, and was inspired by a similar MilkPlus article that explores the gerund-name title device.

Movie titles are too long these days. Or, many of them are. While films like Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl and Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World can't hold a candle to 1990s oddities The Englishman Who Went Up a Hill but Came Down a Mountain or The Positively True Adventures of the Alleged Texas Cheerleader-Murdering Mom, it seems that verbose movie titles are becoming more and more popular.

Most of them seem to have the '[series title]: [entry title]' format - or the slightly different '[series title] and [entry title]' - but there still remain others like the troubling Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events.

Let's count the recent and upcoming films with terribly verbose titles, shall we? We have...

Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story
Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason
Tom Dowd and the Language of Music
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Asterix and Obelix: Mission Cleopatra
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Unchain My Heart: The Ray Charles Story
The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement
Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe

(along with many other somewhat verbose titles like Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo and Benji Returns: Rags to Riches and whatever the Pirates sequel ends up being called)

Now, I can understand the reasoning here in the case of a series: studios want the name recognition. But don't you think The Chronicles of Narnia, The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe is going just a bit much?

Of course, this is nothing new. The same thing happened in the 70s with the Star Wars and Indiana Jones trilogies. But really, would Harry Potter 3 be seen by any fewer people if it was called simply The Prisoner of Azkaban, or, well, Harry Potter 3? When talking about it, nobody says The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, they just say Return of the King, so wouldn't that title work? Thank God we aren't getting Spider-Man 2: The Wrath of Doctor Octopus this summer.

I guess I'm just saying this epidemic had better stop soon, or we'll have another The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies on our hands, and no one wants that.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nothing can really match "Night of the Day of the Dawn of the Son of the Bride of the Return of the Revenge of the Terror of the Attack of the Evil, Mutant, Alien, Flesh Eating, Hellbound, Zombified Living Dead Part 2: In Shocking 2-D", the movie from 1991 with such a long title that IMDB had to cut it short to fit it in the database.

October 3, 2004 at 6:36 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home